4.6 Article

A Li+-conductive microporous carbon-sulfur composite for Li-S batteries

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 87, 期 -, 页码 497-502

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.09.086

关键词

Lithium-sulfur battery; Carbon microsphere; Microporous carbon-sulfur composite; Insoluble electrolyte; Solid-solid redox mechanism

资金

  1. 973 Program of China [2009CB220100]
  2. National 863 Program of China [2011AA11A256]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we propose a new strategy to develop high performance sulfur electrode by impregnating sulfur into the micropores of a Li+-insertable carbon matrix with the simultaneous use of a carbonate electrolyte, which does not dissolve polysulfides, to restrain the solution of the reaction intermediates of sulfur. To proof this concept, we prepared a Li+-insertable microporous carbon-sulfur composite by vaporizing sulfur into the micropores of the nanofiber-wired carbon microspheres. The experimental results demonstrate that, in the carbonate electrolyte of 1 M LiPF6/PC-EC-DEC, such S/C composite electrode exhibits not only stable cycling performance with a reversible capacity of 720 mAh g(-1) after 100 cycles, but also superior high coulombic efficiency of similar to 100% upon extended cycling (except the first three cycles). The structural and electrochemical analysis indicates that the improved electrochemical behaviors of the S/C composite arise from a new reaction mechanism, in which Li+ ions and electrons transport through the carbon matrix into the interior of the cathode and then react with the embedded sulfur in the S/C solid-solid interfaces, avoiding the solution of the intermediates into the bulk electrolyte. More significantly, the structural design and working mechanism of such a sulfur cathode could be extended to a variety of poorly conductive and easily soluble redox-active materials for battery applications. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据