4.6 Article

Electrochemical activation of graphite felt electrode for VO2+/VO2+ redox couple application

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 89, 期 -, 页码 429-435

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.11.072

关键词

Vanadium redox flow battery; Graphite felt electrode; Electrochemical oxidation; Cathode electrolyte

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20973099]
  2. Shenzhen Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [JC201104210149A]
  3. Basic Research Program of Shenzhen [JC201005310703A, JC201005310712A, CXB201005250040A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, the electrochemical activation of graphite felt electrode for vanadium redox flow battery (VRB) was studied. Graphite felt (GF) electrode was oxidized at a range of electrochemical oxidation degrees in H2SO4 solution. The electrochemical performance of the treaded GF was discussed, and the law of the surface properties of GF which changed along with the electrochemical oxidation degree was proposed. The structure, composition, surface tension and electrochemical properties of the oxidized GF (OGF) were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), contact angle measurements, cyclic voltammetry (CV), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The GF oxidized at 560-840 mAh g(-1) exhibited the best activity toward VO2+/VO2+ redox reaction, according with the highest C OH and COOH content (ca. 34%) on its surface. The mechanisms of VO2+/VO2+ redox reaction on OGF were also discussed. VRB single cell with pristine GF and OGF as the electrode were test at various charge-discharge current densities, respectively. The columbic efficiency (CE), voltage efficiency (VE) and energy efficiency (EE) of the cell using OGF electrode are much higher than the cell using pristine GF, suggested that the electro-oxidation method is a promising technology for the activation of GF electrode. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据