4.6 Article

Sol-gel derived nanostructured Li2MnSiO4/C cathode with high storage capacity

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 102, 期 -, 页码 290-298

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.04.009

关键词

Li2MnSiO4/C; Nanostructure; Flat charge/discharge plateau; High capacity; Stable cycle-life

资金

  1. US DARPA [R-265-000-320-597]
  2. Ministry of Education Singapore [NUS FRC R-265-000-387-112]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon-coated, nanostructured Li2MnSiO4 (LMS/C) was synthesized by sol-gel method using a chelating carbonizing source, Glucono-1,5-lactone (GAL). Powder X-ray diffraction studies confirmed nominally pure phase formation. SEM and TEM studies revealed that LMS/C is comprised of particles of less than 50 nm in diameter with a thin film of 1-5 nm amorphous carbon coating. Elemental mapping demonstrated a homogenous distribution of carbon throughout LMS/C. Besides carbon coating, GAL promotes phase purity and reduces particle agglomeration during annealing. Raman spectroscopic study revealed that the carbon formed in LMS/C nanocomposite is mostly amorphous. The electrochemical performance of LMS/C was evaluated by galvanostatic charge/discharge cycles at various C-rates. We report here a well-defined, flat charge/discharge plateau for LMS/C with extraction/insertion of 1.5 Li+-ion per formula unit at room temperature in a narrow potential window 2.0-4.5 V at various current rates. Together with ex situ XPS studies carried out at various states of charge we confirm that the charge and discharge plateaus are associated with the redox chemistry of manganese. LMS/C exhibits a stable discharge capacity for about 10 cycles at various C-rates. However, the capacity fades gradually after 11 cycles at all C-rates. An ex situ XRD study confirmed that the phase was retained up to 10 cycles. The stable cycle-life and the improvement in observed electrochemical performance is attributed to the phase retention in LMS/C nanocomposite. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据