4.6 Article

Fabrication of horseradish peroxidase immobilized poly(N-[3-(trimethoxy silyl)propyl]aniline) gold nanorods film modified electrode and electrochemical hydrogen peroxide sensing

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 92, 期 -, 页码 71-78

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.01.032

关键词

Gold nanorod; Surface modification; Horseradish peroxidase; Direct electron transfer; Hydrogen peroxide; Bioelectrocatalyst

资金

  1. Priority Research Centers Program through a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology [2009-0093819]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0013334]
  4. Kyungpook National University Research Fund
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0013334] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report a simple and one-pot procedure for the simultaneous immobilization of poly(N-[3-(trimethoxy sily)propyl[aniline (PTMSPA) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) on gold nanorods (GNRs) to yield HRP/PTMSPA@GNRs. HRP/PTMSPA@GNR was well characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy and UV-visible spectroscopy. High resolution image of HRP/PTMSPA@GNR attributes GNRs are welded/connected to one another through the surface coated PTMSPA. Direct electron transfer was achieved at HRP/PTMSPA@GNR with an electron transfer rate constant (k(s)) of 3.2 +/- 0.1 s(-1). Cyclic voltammograms of H2O2 at HRP/PTMSPA@GNR modified electrode exhibited a stable reduction peak at approximately -0.25 V. Amperometric response of HRP/PTMSPA@GNR modified electrode showed quick response (<5 s) for the reduction of H2O2. HRP/PTMSPA@GNR showed wide linear range from 1 x 10(-5) to 1 x 10(-3) M with detection limit (0.06 mu M) (S/N =3). HRP/PTMSPA@GNR modified electrode exhibited high selectivity with sensitivity (0.021 mu A/mu M) toward H2O2. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据