4.6 Article

Covalently grafted platinum nanoparticles to multi walled carbon nanotubes for enhanced electrocatalytic oxygen reduction

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 92, 期 -, 页码 168-175

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.10.160

关键词

Electrocatalyst; Oxygen reduction; Covalent bonding; Koutecky-Levich plot; Fuel cells

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2010-0007864]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0007864] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A carbon nanostructure has fabricated from covalently grafted platinum (Pt) to multi walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) with the assistance of sulfur atom on the MWCNT's sidewall, MWCNT-S-Pt. The MWCNT-S-Pt displays an excellent electrocatalytic performance for oxygen-reduction reaction (ORR) than that of an unbonded Pt to MWCNT, MWCNT/Pt. Here we describe a comparative study of the ORR on two MWCNT-supported Pt-based catalysts in aqueous acidic electrolyte. Both MWCNT-S-Pt and MWCNT/Pt catalysts have the compositions of 1.03 and 2.18 at% Pt, respectively. For the characterization, the bonding features have confirmed by the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) and electron microscopy have used to determine the size and shape as well as the distribution of the particle on both catalysts. Electrochemical measurements have performed using the cyclic voltammetry and hydrodynamic voltammetry methods in 0.1 mol l(-1) HCIO4 solution. Kinetic analysis in comparison to unbonded MWCNT/Pt a significant enhancement for the covalently bonded MWCNT-S-Pt has been found. The MWCNT/Pt is unstable at electrode potentials for long term use than that of MWCNT-S-Pt. Ring-current collection measurements for peroxide indicate MWCNT-S-Pt catalyst has a less peroxide yield. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据