4.6 Article

Comparative study of three lactate oxidases from Aerococcus viridans for biosensing applications

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 93, 期 -, 页码 72-79

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.01.080

关键词

L-Lactate oxidases from Aerococcus viridans; Engineered and commercial enzymes; Multi-walled carbon nanotubes; Enzyme biosensor

资金

  1. Swiss Confederation
  2. Nano-Tera.ch

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A comparison between engineered and commercially available L-lactate oxidases from Aerococcus viridans was conducted for biosensing applications. Enzymes were adsorbed onto the surfaces of graphite electrodes modified with multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Thermostable L-lactate oxidases were cloned with a (i) N-, (ii) a C-terminal His-tag and (iii) a wild-type enzyme. Subsequently to the heterologous expression in Escherichia coli and purification, we determined the kinetic parameters of these enzymes in solution. The kinetics of the wild-type, of the N-terminally His-tagged enzyme and of the commercial L-lactate oxidase from A. viridans were studied with a classical Michaelis-Menten as well as with a substrate inhibition model, while the enzyme carrying a C-terminal His-tag showed no activity. The active enzymes were used to fabricate and comparatively investigate multi-walled carbon nanotubes-based biosensors. The enzyme kinetic results were compared with electrochemical studies. By using both spectrophotometric and amperometric techniques, the inhibition phenomenon fits better to the data especially those data related with Lox-His-N. The electrochemical data of the fabricated enzymatic biosensors showed that the N-terminally His-tagged L-lactate oxidase performed best on carboxyl-modified carbon nanotubes. The sensor based on this engineered enzyme showed the highest sensitivity and lowest detection limit in the range of L-lactate concentration 0-1 mM as well as long term stability over one month. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据