4.6 Article

Effective enhancement of electrochemical properties for LiFePO4/C cathode materials by Na and Ti co-doping

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 89, 期 -, 页码 479-487

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.11.081

关键词

Lithium ion batteries; LiFePO4/C cathode materials; Na and Ti co-doping; High-temperature solid-state method; Electrochemical performance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20871101]
  2. Fund of Natural Science of Hunan Province [09BG005]
  3. Xiangtan City [09BG005]
  4. Industrial Project of Colleges and Universities of Hunan Province [10CY005]
  5. Project of Condition Research of Hunan Province [2010TC2004]
  6. Colleges and Universities in Hunan Province plans [CX2011B268]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Na and Ti co-doping Li1-xNaxFe1-xTixPO4/C (x = 0.00, 0.01, 0.03 and 0.05) composites were synthesized by a simple high-temperature solid-state method. The structure, morphology and electrochemical performance of the samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscope (SEM), charge/discharge tests, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT). The results showed that the Na and Ti co-doped samples kept the olivine structure of LiFePO4, but Na and Ti co-doping can optimize the crystal microstructure, modify the particle morphology, decrease charge transfer resistance, enhance exchange current density, electrical conductivity and Li ion diffusion velocity, and thus improve the electrochemical performance of the LiFePO4/C. Among all the doped samples, Li0.97Na0.03Fe0.97Ti0.03PO4/C showed the best rate capability and cycling stability. The initial discharge capacity of Li0.97Na0.03Fe0.97Ti0.03PO4/C was 151.0 mAh g(-1) with the capacity retention ratio of 99.3% after 100 cycles at 1C. Especially, it still showed a high discharge capacity of over 97.3 mAh g(-1) even at a high rate of 20C. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据