4.6 Article

High performance sputtered LiCoO2 thin films obtained at a moderate annealing treatment combined to a bias effect

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 60, 期 -, 页码 121-129

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.11.033

关键词

LiCoO2 thin films; Lithium microbattery; Raman spectroscopy; RF sputtering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

LiCoO2 thin films have been successfully deposited by radio frequency magnetron sputtering onto aluminum substrate and post-annealed at a lower temperature of 500 degrees C compared to usual annealing treatments. We demonstrate that an appropriate combination of key deposition parameters including a high working pressure and a substrate bias enables for the first time the reproducible synthesis at this moderate temperature of high performance layered HT-LiCoO2 thin films. The morphology, the structure and the electrochemical behaviour of the deposits have been examined as a function of the working gas pressure ranging from 0.55 Pa to 3 Pa. Raman microspectrometry has been thoroughly used to characterize the structure of the thin films: a mixture of the layered HT-LiCoO2 and the cubic LT-LiCoO2 phases is systematically revealed in the absence of substrate bias and for the first time, the access to the relative amount of both compounds is allowed. A promoting effect of increasing gas pressure on the formation of the layered HT-LiCoO2 phase is demonstrated, the HT/LT relative amount increasing from 1:3 at 0.55 Pa to 3:4 at 3 Pa. In a second step, we show that the effect of substrate bias combined with high values of working gas pressure and a moderate heat treatment (500 degrees C) leads to the formation of pure HT-LiCoO2 thin films at 3 Pa, with very attractive electrochemical properties: a high specific capacity of 67 mu A h cm(-2) mu m(-1) at C/5 rate, a good adherence to the substrate and the best capacity retention known for a LiCoO2 film in liquid electrolyte (4.2-3 V). (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据