4.6 Article

Application of bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide lithium-N-methyl-N-butylpiperidinium-bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide-poly(vinylidene difluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) ionic liquid gel polymer electrolytes in Li/LiFePO4 batteries at different temperatures

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 85, 期 -, 页码 49-56

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.08.066

关键词

Lithium ion batteries; Ionic liquid; Polymer electrolyte; PP14TFSI; P(VdF-HFP)

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21276057]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China [B201007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ionic liquid gel polymer electrolyte (ILGPE) based on N-methyl-N-butylpiperidinium-bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (PP14TFSI), bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide lithium salt (LiTFSI) and poly(vinylidene difluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) (P(VdF-HFP)) is prepared for lithium ion batteries by solution casting. The ILGPE is characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermogravimetry (TG) and electrochemical tests. The results indicate that the addition of PP14TFSI to the P(VdF-HFP)-LiTESI polymer electrolyte leads to 3-dimensional network structures, and the ILGPE is stable below 150 degrees C and will not decompose until 310 degrees C without considering the volatilizing of the residual solvent. The ionic conductivity increases with the temperature rising, and the ionic conductivity is 0.23 x 10(-3) S cm(-1) and 2.1 x 10(-3) S cm(-1) at 20 degrees C and 80 degrees C, respectively. The electrochemical window is -0.15 to 4.85 V vs. Li+/Li, which is wide enough to be used with common electrode materials. Battery tests show that the ILGPE is stable even at 80 degrees C when operated in Li/LiFePO4 batteries, and Li/LiFePO4 batteries with the gel polymer electrolyte exhibit good cycling performance at 60 degrees C at 1C current rate. The discharge capacity was 131.01 mAh g(-1) after 100 cycles with 90% capacity retention. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据