4.6 Article

Scale-up of rotating cylinder electrode electrochemical reactor for Cu(II) recovery: Experimental and simulation study in turbulence regimen

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 77, 期 -, 页码 262-271

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.06.003

关键词

Rotating cylinder electrode (RCE); Electrochemical reactor scale-up; Electroplating industry; Cu(II) recovery; Hydrodynamics and mass transport in turbulence regimen; Computational simulation with Comsol Multiphysics 3.5a

资金

  1. ICyT-DF, Mexico [ICyTDF/013/2009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper describes a methodology for scaling-up a RCE bench scale reactor (0.350 L) to pilot scale reactor (RCE-PP, 10 L) by means of geometric correlations, dimensionless numbers, and computational simulation (Comsol Multiphysics 3.5a) in 2D for hydrodynamics and mass transport in turbulence regimen. The methodology proposed is validated by experimental data of Cu(II) recovery from a solution mimicking an effluent of electroplating industry (0.019 M CuSO4 and 1 M H2SO4). The experimental conditions of Taylor number (5.22 x 10(5) to 7.84 x 10(5)) and limiting current (51.56-74.67 mA cm(-2)) used in the present work ensure a turbulent flow regime and electrochemical reaction controlled by mass transport, respectively. Under these experimental conditions, the hydrodynamic behavior was described using the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations and the k-epsilon turbulence model as well as the wall functions based on the universal distribution of velocities for the near-wall region. The diffusion-convection equation was solved using the Kays-Crawford model for turbulent Schmidt number (Sc-T) and mass transfer wall functions of Launder-Spalding type. The simulation results of the RCE bench scale in 21). using the fitting parameter A reported by Rivera et al. [1], predict the experimental data (error <8%) of copper concentration decay in the RCE-PP up to 80% of galvanostatic copper recovery. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据