4.6 Article

Electrochemical performances of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-NiFe2O4 nanocomposite as electrode for supercapacitor

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 55, 期 16, 页码 4677-4684

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.03.077

关键词

PEDOT; NiFe2O4; Supercapacitor; Electrical double layer capacitance; Pseudocapacitance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (PEDOT)-based NiFe2O4 conducting nanocomposites were synthesized and their electrochemical properties were studied in order to find out their suitability as electrode materials for supercapacitor. Nanocrystalline nickel ferrites (5-20 nm) have been synthesized by sol-gel method. Reverse microemulsion polymerization in n-hexane medium for PEDOT nanotube and aqueous miceller dispersion polymerization for bulk PEDOT formation using different surfactants have been adopted. Structural morphology and characterization were studied using XRD, SEM, TEM and IR spectroscopy. Electrochemical performances of these electrode materials were carried out using cyclic voltammetry at different scan rates (2-20 mV/s) and galvanostatic charge-discharge at different constant current densities (0.5-10 mA/cm(2)) in acetonitrile solvent containing 1 M LiClO4 electrolyte. Nanocomposite electrode material shows high specific capacitance (251 F/g) in comparison to its constituents viz NiFe2O4 (127 F/g) and PEDOT (156 F/g) where morphology of the pore structure plays a significant role over the total surface area. Contribution of pseudocapacitance (C-FS) arising from the redox reactions over the electrical double layer capacitance (C-DL) in the composite materials have also been investigated through the measurement of AC impedance in the frequency range 10 kHz-10 mHz with a potential amplitude of 5 mV. The small attenuation (similar to 16%) in capacitance of PEDOT-NiFe2O4 composite over 500 continuous charging/discharging cycles suggests its excellent electrochemical stability. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据