4.6 Article

Simultaneous voltammetric determination of acetaminophen, aspirin and caffeine using an in situ surfactant-modified multiwalled carbon nanotube paste electrode

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 55, 期 28, 页码 8638-8648

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.07.093

关键词

Acetaminophen; Aspirin; Caffeine; Carbon nanotubes; Triton X 100

资金

  1. University Grants Commission New Delhi India
  2. US Army International Technology Center Tokyo Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A carbon nanotube paste electrode modified in situ with Triton X 100 was developed for the individual and simultaneous determination of acetaminophen (ACOP) aspirin (ASA) and caffeine (CF) The electrochemical behavior of these three molecules was investigated employing cyclic voltammetry (CV) electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) chronocoulometry (CC) and adsorptive stripping differential pulse voltammetry (AdSDPV) Kramers-Kronig transformation implied that the resulting impedance data were validated and were of very good quality These studies revealed that the oxidation of ACOP ASA and CF is facilitated at an in situ surfactant-modified multiwalled carbon nanotube paste electrode (ISSM-CNT-PE) After optimization of analytical conditions employing this electrode at pH 7 0 in phosphate buffer (0 1 M) the peak currents for the three molecules were found to vary linearly with their concentrations in the range of 2 91 x 10(-7)-6 27 x 10(-5) M with detection limits of 258 x 10(-8) 8 47 x 10(-8) and 8 83 x 10-8 M for ACOP ASA and CF respectively using AdSDPV The prepared modified electrode showed several advantages such as a simple preparation method high sensitivity very low detection limits and excellent reproducibility Furthermore the proposed method was employed for the simultaneous determination of ACOP ASA and CF in pharmaceutical formulations urine and blood serum samples and the obtained results were found to be satisfactory (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据