4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Probing the electrochemical behaviour of SWCNT-cobalt nanoparticles and their electrocatalytic activities towards the detection of nitrite at acidic and physiological pH conditions

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 55, 期 14, 页码 4319-4327

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.02.102

关键词

Single-walled carbon nanotubes; Cobalt nanoparticles; Electron transfer behaviour; Impedance spectroscopy; Adsorption; Nitrite detection

资金

  1. University of Pretoria
  2. NRF [2073666]
  3. Research Infrastructure Support Programme (RISP) [65305]
  4. Nanotechnology Flagship Programme (NFP) [68338]
  5. DST/MINTEK (NIC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electrochemical decoration of edge plane pyrolytic graphite electrode (EPPGE) with cobalt and cobalt oxide nanoparticles integrated with and without single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) is described. Successful modification of the electrodes was confirmed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). AFM and EDX techniques. The electron transfer behaviour of the modified electrodes was investigated in [Fe(CN)6](3-/4-) redox probe using cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and discussed. The study showed that cobalt nanoparticles modified electrodes exhibit faster electron transfer behaviour than their oxides. The catalytic rate constant (K) obtained at the EPPGE-SWCNT-Co for nitrite at pH 7.4 and 3.0 are approximately the same (similar to 3 x 10(4) cm(3) mol(-1) s(-1)) while the limits of detection (LoD = 3.3 delta/m) are in the mu M order. From the adsorption stripping voltammetry, the electrochemical adsorption equilibrium constant beta was estimated as (13.0 +/- 0.1) x 10(3) M-1 at pH 7.4 and (56.7 +/- 0.1) x 10(3) M-1 at pH 3.0 while the free energy change (Delta G degrees) due to the adsorption was estimated as -6.36 and -10.00 kJ mol(-1) for nitrite at pH 7.4 and 3.0, respectively. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据