4.6 Article

Electrochemical investigations of ionic liquids with vinylene carbonate for applications in rechargeable lithium ion batteries

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 55, 期 15, 页码 4618-4626

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.03.019

关键词

Ionic liquids; Vinylene carbonate; Pyrrolidinium; Piperidinium; Additive; Lithium ion batteries

资金

  1. ORNL laboratory-directed research and development (LDRD) [D10-036, DE-AC05-00OR22725]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ionic liquids based on methylpropylpyrrolidinium (MPPY) and methylpropylpiperidinium (MPPI) cations and bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (TFSI) anion have been synthesized and characterized by thermal analysis, cyclic voltammetry, impedance spectroscopy as well as galvanostatic charge/discharge tests. 10 wt% of vinylene carbonate (VC) was added to the electrolytes of 0.5 M LiTFSI/MPPY.TFSI and 0.5 M LiTFSI/MPPI.TFSI, which were evaluated in Li parallel to natural graphite (NG) half cells at 25 degrees C and 50 degrees C under different current densities. At 25 degrees C, due to their intrinsic high viscosities, the charge/discharge capacities under the current density of 80 mu A cm(-2) were much lower than those under the current density of 40 mu A cm(-2). At 50 degrees C, with reduced viscosities, the charge/discharge capacities under both current densities were almost indistinguishable, which were also close to the typical values obtained using conventional carbonate electrolytes. In addition, the discharge capacities of the half cells were very stable with cycling, due to the effective formation of solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on the graphite electrode On the contrary, the charge/discharge capacities of the Li parallel to LiCoO2 cells using both ionic liquid electrolytes under the current density of 40 mu A cm(-2) decreased continually with cycling, which were primarily due to the low oxidative stability of VC on the surface of LiCoO2 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据