4.6 Article

Promethazine determination in plasma samples by using carbon paste electrode modified with molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP): Coupling of extraction, preconcentration and electrochemical determination

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 55, 期 20, 页码 5867-5873

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.05.037

关键词

Promethazine; Molecularly imprinted polymer; Voltammetric determination; Carbon paste modified electrode

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A promethazine (PMZ) molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) and a non-imprinted polymer (NIP) were synthesized by two different formulations of methacrylic acid-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (MAA-EGDMA) and vinyl benzene-divinyl benzene (VB-DVB). Then, the MIPs were used to modify the carbon paste electrode (CP). The response difference between MIP-CP and NIP-CP electrodes, containing VB-DVB polymer, was higher than that for MIP-CP and NIP-CP modified with polymer of MM-EGDMA, indicating the lower nonselective surface adsorption property of the VB-DVB based MIP. The MIP, incorporated in the carbon paste electrode, functioned as selectively recognition element and pre-concentrator agent for PMZ determination. The prepared electrode was used for PMZ measurement by the three steps procedure including analyte extraction in the electrode, electrode washing and electrochemical measurement of PMZ. It was shown that the electrode washing, after PMZ extraction, led to enhanced selectivity. Square wave voltammetry (SWV) for PMZ determination by proposed electrode was proved to be better than that of differential pulse voltammetry. Some parameters, effective on the electrode response, were optimized and then a calibration curve was plotted. Two dynamic linear range of 7 x 10(-9) to 4 x 10(-7) and 4 x 10(-7) to 7 x 10(-6) mol L-1 were obtained. The detection limit of the method was calculated equal to 3.2 x 10(-9) mol L-1. This method was used successful for PMZ determination in blood serum sample. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据