4.6 Article

Electrochemical behavior of an indenedione derivative electrodeposited on a renewable sol-gel derived carbon ceramic electrode modified with multi-wall carbon nanotubes: Application for electrocatalytic determination of hydrazine

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 54, 期 10, 页码 2828-2836

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.11.011

关键词

Hydrazine; MWCNTS; Sol-gel; Carbon ceramic electrode; Indenedione derivatives

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel modified carbon ceramic electrode (CCE) containing multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) was fabricated by a sol-gel technique. The prepared MWCNT-CCE was modified by the electrodeposition of an indenedione derivative. The indenedione modified MWCNT-CCE (IMWCNT-CCE) shows one pair of peaks with surface confined characteristics. According to the theoretical model of Laviron, estimations were made in different pHs of the surface charge transfer rate constant, k(s), and the charge transfer coefficient, alpha, for electron transfer between the indenedione derivative and MWCNT-CCE. The modified electrode shows a highly catalytic activity toward hydrazine electrooxidation at a wide pH range (5-9). The kinetic parameters such as the electron transfer coefficient, alpha, the heterogeneous rate constant, W, and the exchange current of hydrazine at the IMWCNT-CCE were calculated as 0.29 +/- 0.01, 2.7(+/- 0.3) x 10(-3) cm s(-1) and 0.17 +/- 0.03 mu A, respectively. Also, the modified electrode shows an excellent analytical performance for voltammetric determination of hydrazine. Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) exhibits two linear dynamic ranges, 0.6-8.0 mu M and 8.0-100.0 mu M, and a lower detection limit of 0.29 mu M for hydrazine. Finally, the practical analytical utility is illustrated by differential pulse voltammetric determination of hydrazine in auxiliary cooling water at IMWCNT-CCE and the accuracy of the results is verified in comparison with those obtained from the standard ASTM method. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据