4.6 Article

Non-platinum oxygen reduction electrocatalysts based on pyrolyzed transition metal macrocycles

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 53, 期 27, 页码 7875-7883

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.05.047

关键词

pyrolyzed porphyrins; oxygen reduction; polymer electrolyte fuel cells; non-platinum; non-supported

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work pyrolyzed porphyrins were investigated for oxygen reduction electrocatalysis. Pyrolysis of non-supported cobalt and iron tetraphenylporphyrins in the temperature range of 500-800 degrees C generates high surface area catalysts with high degree of exposure of active sites to the reacting species. This is achieved through templating porphyrins on fumed amorphous silica that is removed after pyrolysis by etching with concentrated KOH. Detailed material characterization of the pyrolyzed materials is presented here. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis of cobalt and iron porphyrins was used to elucidate the transformations of nitrogen, carbon, cobalt and iron species resulting from the heat treatment. Partial decomposition of the precursor material and formation of polymer-like network decorated by metal oxide particles are identified. Differences in the chemical composition of products of pyrolysis of FeTPP, CoTPP and Co/FeTPP are discussed. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging revealed the structure of the pyrolyzed porphyrins and was used to gain insight into the size of the metal crystals formed in the bulk. X-ray diffraction spectra (XRD) provided information about the type of crystals formed in the different formulations of the precursor porphyrins. Further, steady state polarization curves were obtained utilizing gas diffusion type electrodes in 0.5 M sulfuric acid and membrane electrode assembly (MEA) configurations under working PEM fuel cell conditions. This work revealed the necessity of the metal phases for the oxygen reduction process. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据