4.6 Article

Corrosion resistant low temperature carburized SS 316 as bipolar plate material for PEMFC application

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 53, 期 6, 页码 2743-2750

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.10.061

关键词

PEM fuel cell; bipolar plate; LTC SS 316; stainless steel; low temperature carburizing; corrosion in fuel cell; electrochemical corrosion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the current challenges for application of PEM fuel cell is to find corrosion resistant, electrically conductive, light weight, cost competitive bipolar plate material. Low temperature carburization (LTC) of stainless steels is a novel, patented process by Swagelok Company. This paper addresses the corrosion resistance characteristics of LTC SS 316 for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) bipolar plate applications. Corrosion properties of this material were studied using potentiodynamic and potentiostatic tests in simulated (1 M H2SO4 + 2 ppm HF, 0.5 M H2SO4, pH: 4.0, and 5% HCl + 5% Na2SO4) PEMFC conditions. LTC SS 316 showed excellent corrosion resistance in these conditions compared to SS 316. The mechanism of anodic dissolution and general corrosion of LTC SS 316 was observed to be similar to SS 316 however the extent of LTC SS 316 corrosion was less. LTC SS 316 showed corrosion currents well below 16 mu A cm(-2) in anodic and cathodic atmospheres under potentiostatic conditions. The potentiostatic cut-rent rapidly falls to similar to 4.0 and similar to 1.5 mu A cm(-2) under anodic and cathodic conditions, respectively. LTC SS 316 was observed to form a thinner oxide layer as compared to SS 316 after 24 h of potentiostatic testing. Moreover LTC SS 316 lowered the interfacial contact resistance by approximately 24% as compared to SS 316 after corrosion testing. Hence this study clearly states the performance advantage of using LTC SS 316 as bipolar plate material as compared to conventional materials. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据