4.8 Article

Aggrecan Nanoscale Solid Fluid Interactions Are a Primary Determinant of Cartilage Dynamic Mechanical Properties

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 2614-2625

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn5062707

关键词

aggrecan; cartilage; nanomechanics; AFM; dynamic loading; poroelasticity; hydraulic permeability

资金

  1. NIH [0603312]
  2. Whitaker Health Sciences Fund Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poroelastic interactions between interstitial fluid and the extracellular matrix of connective tissues are critical to biological and pathophysiological functions involving,solute-transport, energy dissipation, self-stiffening and lubrication. However, the molecular origins of poroelasticity at the nanoscale are largely unknown.,Here, the brod-spectrum dynamic nanomechanical behavior of cartilage aggrecan monolayer is revealed for the first time, including the equilibrium and instantaneous moduli and the peak in the phase angle Of the complex modulus. By performing a length scale study and comparing the experimental results to theoretical predictions, we confirm that the mechanism underlying the observed dynamic nanomechanics is due to solid fluid interactions (poroelasticity) at the molecular scale. Utilizing finite element Modeling, the molecular-scale hydraulic permeability of the aggrecan assembly was quantified (k(aggrecan) = (4.8 +/- 2.8) x 10(-15) m(4)/N.s) and found to be similar to the nanoscale hydraulic permeability of intact normal cartilage tissue but much lower than that of early diseased tissue. The mechanisms underlying aggrecan poroelasticity were further investigated by altering electrostatic interactions between,the molecule's constituent glycosaminoglycan chains: electrostatic interactions dominated steric interactions in-governing molecular behavior. While the:hydraulic permeability of aggrecan layers does not change across species and age, aggrecan from adult human cartilage is stiffer than the aggrecan from newborn human tissue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据