4.6 Review

The prognostic value of micrometastases and isolated tumour cells in histologically negative lymph nodes of patients with colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

EJSO
卷 40, 期 3, 页码 263-269

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.12.002

关键词

Colorectal neoplasm; Staging; Occult tumour cells; Lymph nodes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Detection of occult tumour cells in lymph nodes of patients with stage I/II colorectal cancer is associated with decreased survival. However, according to recent guidelines, occult tumour cells should be categorised in micrometastases (MMs) and isolated tumour cells (ITCs). This meta-analysis evaluates the prognostic value of MMs and of ITCs, separately. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Biosis and the World Health Organization International Trials Registry Platform were searched for papers published until April 2013. Studies on the prognostic value of MMs and ITCs in lymph nodes of stage I/II colorectal cancer patients were included. Odds ratios (ORs) for the development of disease recurrence were calculated to analyse the predictive value of MMs and ITCs. Results: From five papers, ORs for disease recurrence could be calculated for MMs and ITCs separately. In patients with colorectal cancer, disease recurrence was significantly increased in the presence of MMs in comparison with absent occult tumour cells (OR 5.63; 95%CI 2.4-13.13). This was even more pronounced in patients with colon cancer (OR 7.25 95%CI 1.82-28.97). In contrast, disease recurrence was not increased in the presence of ITCs (OR 1.00 95%CI 0.53-1.88). Conclusion: Patients with stage I/II colorectal cancer and MMs have a worse prognosis than patients without occult tumour cells. However, ITCs do not have a predictive value. The distinction between ITCs and MMs should be made if the detection of occult tumour cells is incorporated in the clinical decision for adjuvant treatment. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据