4.6 Article

Long-term survival in patients with germ cell testicular cancer: A population-based competing-risks regression analysis

期刊

EJSO
卷 40, 期 1, 页码 103-112

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.09.019

关键词

Testicular germ cell tumor; Secondary malignancy; Long-term survival; Other-cancer mortality; Cancer-specific mortality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Backgrounds: Incidence of secondary malignancies and cardiovascular diseases among testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) survivors is higher compared to the general population. We sought to describe the rates of other-cancer (OCM), non-cancer related (NCRM), and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) among men with TGCT. Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, 31,330 patients with a primary diagnosis of TGCT between 1973 and 2009 were identified. The primary endpoints comprised of 15-year CSM, OCM, and NCRM rates. Survival rates were stratified according to histology (seminoma vs. non-seminoma), median age (<34 vs. >= 34 years old), and disease stage (localized vs. regional vs. distant). Competing-risks Poisson regression methodologies were performed. Results: For seminoma patients, the rates of CSM at 15 years increased with advancing stage (0.4-12.6%; P < 0.001), but varies little with age. In contrast, the rates of OCM (0.4-7.9%) and NCRM (2.9-8.9%) at 15 years increased with advancing stage and age (all P < 0.001). For non-seminoma patients, the 15-year CSM rates increased with advancing stage and age (1.9-24.4%; all P < 0.001). For the same time point, the rates of OCM (0.3-11.4%) and NCRM (2.4-8.0%) also increased with age and stage (all P < 0.001). Conclusions: The risk of dying from secondary malignancies or other causes significantly increases with advancing stage and age at diagnosis among TGCT survivors. Such information can help provide patients and physicians with better screening strategies, follow-up protocols, and mental preparedness for such undesirable effects. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据