4.6 Article

The indocyanine green method is equivalent to the 99mTc-labeled radiotracer method for identifying the sentinel node in breast cancer: A concordance and validation study

期刊

EJSO
卷 39, 期 12, 页码 1332-1336

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.10.004

关键词

Breast cancer sentinel node biopsy; Sentinel node identification; Indocyanine green; Radio-labeled colloid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: The aim of this study was to assess concordance between the indocyanine green (ICG) method and Tc-99m-radiotracer method to identify the sentinel node (SN) in breast cancer. Evidence supports the feasibility and efficacy of the ICG to identify the SN, however this method has not been prospectively compared with the gold-standard radiotracer method in terms of SN detection rate. Methods: Between June 2011 and January 2013, 134 women with clinically node-negative early breast cancer received subdermal/peritumoral injection of Tc-99m-labeled tracer for lymphoscintigraphy, followed by intraoperative injection of ICG for fluorescence detection of SNs using an exciting light source combined with a camera. In all patients, SNs were first identified by the fluorescence method (ICG-positive) and removed. A gamma ray-detecting probe was then used to determine whether ICG-positive SNs were hot (Tc-99m-positive) and to identify and remove any Tc-99m-positive (ICG-negative) SNs remaining in the axilla. The study was powered to perform an equivalence analysis. Results: The 134 patients provided 246 SNs, detected by one or both methods. 1, 2 and 3 SNs, respectively, were detected, removed and examined in 70 (52.2%), 39 (29.1%) and 17 (12.7%) patients; 4-10 SNs were detected and examined in the remaining 8 patients. The two methods were concordant for 230/246 (93.5%) SNs and discordant for 16 (6.5%) SNs. The ICG method detected 99.6% of all SNs. Conclusions: Fluorescent lymphangiography with ICG allows easy identification of axillary SNs, at a frequency not inferior to that of radiotracer, and can be used alone to reliably identify SNs. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据