4.6 Article

Preoperative plasma D-dimer levels predict survival in patients with operable non-small cell lung cancer independently of venous thromboembolism

期刊

EJSO
卷 39, 期 9, 页码 951-956

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.06.008

关键词

Non-small cell lung cancer; Operable; D-dimer; Prognosis; Venous thromboembolism

资金

  1. Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Project [12ZCDSY15600, 09ZCZDSF04400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and aims: D-dimer is a stable end product of fibrin degradation that is associated with advanced tumor stage and poor prognosis in lung cancer patients. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent complication of cancer and is associated with a poor prognosis in cancer patients. The purpose of the study is to elucidate whether the increased mortality in non-small cell lung (NSCLC) patients with elevated D-dimer levels is independent of VTE. Patients and methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 232 patients with operable NSCLC from January 2007 to June 2008. All the patients underwent a pneumonectomy, lobectomy or wedge resection. We assessed the ability of preoperative plasma D-dimer levels to predict 1-year mortality and overall survival among them, and a multivariable Cox proportional-hazard regression analysis was performed after controlling for the following potential confounding factors: age, gender, TNM stage, histology, tumor size, VTE and surgical interventions. Results: The overall 1-year survival rate was 91.4% (95% confidence interval (CI), 82.7-94.8%), with a 76.5% survival (95% CI, 71.4-81.6%) in the high D-dimer group and a 93.9% survival (95% CI, 86.4-97.9%) in the normal D-dimer group. Comparing the high D-dimer group with the normal D-dimer group, the adjusted hazard ratio for 1-year mortality and overall survival was 3.19 (95% CI, 1.18-7.12) and 1.54 (95% CI, 1.11-2.78) respectively. Conclusion: Our study concluded that the preoperative plasma D-dimer level is an important prognostic biomarker in patients with operable NSCLC that is independent of VTE. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据