4.6 Article

Equivalent survival in patients with advanced stage IB-II and III-IVA cervical cancer treated by adjuvant surgery following chemoradiotherapy

期刊

EJSO
卷 34, 期 5, 页码 569-575

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.04.006

关键词

cervical cancer; surgery; chemoradiation therapy; survival

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To evaluate survival in patients with advanced cervical cancer who underwent surgery after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Methods: One hundred and forty-four patients with biopsy-proven stage IB-IVA cervical cancer underwent adjuvant surgery after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Surgical resection was classified as curative (no evidence of remaining disease after surgery) or palliative (remaining disease after surgery). Endpoints were pelvic control, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 and 10 years. Analysis included tumour FIGO stage, type of surgery (curative versus palliative), pelvic control, response to chemoradiotherapy and lymphatic status. Results: Tumour FIGO stages were IB-II in 91 cases and III-IVA in 53 cases. Surgery was curative in 127 cases. Pelvic control was achieved in 114 patients and was equivalent in stage IB-II and III-IVA patients. So far, 60 patients have died. The 5-year OS and DFS rates were, respectively, 57.6% [95% CI: 49.1-67.5] and 65% [95% CI: 56.2-75]. OS was significantly affected by the type of surgery (p < 2.10(-16)), the presence of tumoural residue (p = 0.002) and the pelvic lymphatic status (p < 0.001). DFS was affected by the pelvic (p = 0.02) and para-aortic lymphatic status (p = 0.009). No significant difference was observed between OS and DFS in stage IB-II and III-IVA patients, whereas a macroscopic tumoural residue was observed in, respectively, 30.9 and 52.2% of cases (p = 0.022). Conclusion: Survival rates were equivalent between patients with IB-II and III-IVA cervical cancer, suggesting that adjuvant surgery following chemoradiotherapy may improve local control. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据