4.6 Article

Cyclooxygenase-2 expression is related to prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

期刊

EJSO
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 397-402

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.04.011

关键词

COX-2; immunohistochemical staining; esophageal cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Esophageal carcinoma is one of the most aggressive malignancies. Many studies have examined various biological factors associated with the malignant potential of esophageal carcinoma. Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 is overexpressed in various types of human malignancies, including esophageal carcinomas. Although some groups have described COX-2 expression in esophageal adenocarcinoma, few studies have reported COX-2 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: We immunohistochemically investigated relationships between COX-2 overexpression in surgical specimens of primary tumors in 228 patients with ESCC. Relationships between COX-2 expression and clinicopathological factors, including prognosis, were analyzed. COX-2 expressions were classified into 4 criteria: Score 0, no staining; Score 1, <10% staining; Score 2, 10-90% staining; and Score 3, >90% staining. Results: Scores of COX-2 immunoreactivity in 228 patients were as follows: Score 0, 21 of 228; Score 1, 71 of 228; Score 2, 117 of 228; and Score 3, 19 of 228, respectively. COX-2 expression was significantly correlated with depth of invasion and tumor stage (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively). The 5-year survival rate of patients decreased significantly with increased expression of COX-2 (p = 0.005). Multivariate regression analysis indicated COX-2 expression as an independent prognostic factor for ESCC. Conclusions: COX-2 overexpression was significantly correlated with depth of invasion, tumor stage and survival in ESCC. Evaluation of COX-2 expression should be useful for determining tumor properties, including prognosis, in patients with ESCC. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据