4.8 Article

Crystalline LiN5 Predicted from First-Principles as a Possible High-Energy Material

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 6, 期 12, 页码 2363-2366

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00995

关键词

-

资金

  1. China 973 Program [2011CB808200]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [11304141, 11304140, 11304167, 11274136, 11104104, 11025418, 91022029]
  3. Changjiang Scholars Program of China
  4. Changjiang Scholar and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT1132]
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  6. Program for Science and Technology Innovation Research Team at the University of Henan Province [13IRTSTHN020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The search for stable polymeric nitrogen and polynitrogen compounds has attracted great attention due to their potential applications as high-energy-density materials. Here we report a theoretical prediction of an interesting LiN5 crystal through first-principles calculations and unbiased structure searching techniques. Theoretical calculations reveal that crystalline LiN5 is thermodynamically stable at pressures above 9.9 GPa, and remains metastable at ambient conditions. The metastability of LiN5 stems from the inherent stability of the N-5(-) anions and strong anion-cation interactions. It is therefore possible to synthesize LiN5 by compressing solid LiN3 and N-2 gas under high pressure and quench recover the product to ambient conditions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that stable N-5(-) anions are predicted in crystalline states. The weight ratio of nitrogen in LiN5 is nearly 91%, placing LiN5 as a promising high-energy material. The decomposition of LiN5 is expected to be highly exothermic, releasing an energy of approximately 2.72 kJ.g(-1). The present results open a new avenue to synthesize polynitrogen compounds and provide a key perspective toward the understanding of novel chemical bonding in nitrogen-rich compounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据