4.7 Article

Microalgae cultivation and nutrients removal from sewage sludge after ozonizing in algal-bacteria system

期刊

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
卷 165, 期 -, 页码 107-114

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.08.096

关键词

Ozonation; Sewage sludge; Algal-bacterial culture; Nutrient removal; Biomass accumulation

资金

  1. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology [2017DX02]
  2. Applied Technology Research and Development Program of Harbin [2017AB4AS035]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51708157]
  4. Harbin Youth Talent Support Program [2017RAQXJ230]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Separation Membranes and Membrane Processes (Tianjin Polytechnic University) [M2-201701]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The feasibility of growing algae in concentrated wastewater generated from sludge ozonation for simultaneous nutrients removal and biomass production was studied. The effects of bacteria addition into microalgae on nutrients removal, biomass yield and settleability, the growth rate of algae and concentrations of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and soluble microbial products (SMP) were investigated. The results showed that the growth rate of algae in algal-bacteria system (0.2182) was improved than in algae-only system (0.1852), while both of them are comparable with others reported previously. And the addition of bacteria enhanced COD, NH4+-N, TN and TP removal rate by 23.9 +/- 3.3%, 27.7 +/- 3.6%, 16.6 +/- 1.8% and 14.9 +/- 2.2%, respectively. And 32.8 +/- 0.7% of the TN and 50.3 +/- 1.8% of the TP were recycled from ozonated sludge-supernatant (OSS) being absorbed into algal-bacterial biomass. The algal-bacteria system also demonstrated advantages on biomass settleability and heavy metals removal. Finally, the mechanism involving matter exchange and algal bacteria system on OSS treatment in this study were discussed through evaluation of nutrients, SMP and EPS contents, nitrogen and phosphorus balance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据