4.7 Article

Assessment of respiration activity and ecotoxicity of composts containing biopolymers

期刊

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
卷 89, 期 -, 页码 137-142

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.11.021

关键词

Compost; Biodegradable polymer; Respiration activity; Biotest; Toxicity

资金

  1. BIOMASA [POIG 01.01.02-10-123/09]
  2. European Union from the European Regional Development Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research was conducted to determine if introducing biodegradable polymer materials to the composting process would affect selected biological properties of mature compost. Determination of biological properties of composts composed of testing their respiration activity and toxicity. Respiration activity was measured in material from the composting process by means of OxiTop Control measuring system. The ecotoxicity of composts was estimated by means of a set of biotests composed of three microbiotests using five test organisms. Introduction of polymer materials caused a decrease in respiration activity of mature compost. Similar dependencies as in the case of mass loss were registered. Compost to which a biodegradable polymer with the highest content of starch was added revealed the smallest difference in comparison with organic material composted without polymers. Lower content of starch in a polymer caused lower respiration activity of composts, whereas microorganism vaccine might have accelerated maturing of composts, thus contributing to the smallest respiration of compost. In composts containing biopolymers the following were observed: an increase in germination inhibition - 2.5 times, roots growth inhibition - 1.8 times, growth inhibition of Heterocypris incongruens - four times and luminescence inhibition of Vibrio fischeri - 1.6 times in comparison with the control (compost K1). Composts containing biopolymers were classified as toxicity class III, whereas the compost without polymer addition as class II. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据