4.7 Article

Adverse effects of bisphenol A on reproductive physiology in male goldfish at environmentally relevant concentrations

期刊

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
卷 76, 期 -, 页码 56-62

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.09.021

关键词

11-Ketotestosterone; 17 beta-Estradiol; Gonadosomatic index; Hepatosomatic index; Sperm motility; Sperm velocity; Testosterone

资金

  1. GACR [523/09/1793]
  2. CENAKVA [CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0024, QI101C033]
  3. GAJU [047/2010/Z, GAJU 046/2010/Z, ME10125]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alternations of reproductive physiology were studied in the male goldfish (Carassius auratus L) exposed to environmentally relevant concentrations (0.6, 4.5 and 11.0 mu g/L) of bisphenol A (BPA) at days 10, 20 and 30 after exposure. Significant effects of BPA concentration, exposure time and their interactions were observed on testosterone (T), 11-ketotestosterone (11-KT) and sperm motility and velocity, but gonadosomatic index (GSI), hepatosomatic index (HSI) and 17 beta-estradiol (E-2) were not affected. Vitellogenin (VTG) was only affected by BPA concentration. The T and 11-KT levels were significantly decreased in the BPA-treated groups after 20 or 30 days. Sperm motility was significantly decreased at 15, 30, 60 and 90s post-activation in the BPA-treated groups after 20 or 30 days. But, significant decrease in sperm velocity was observed at 30, 60 and 90s post-activation in the BPA-treated groups at all exposure times. The VTG was significantly increased in the males exposed to 11.0 mu g/L at day 30 after exposure. The GSI, HSI and E-2 did not differ between the BPA-treated groups and control. The present study shows that the decrease of sperm quality is concurrent with the decrease of androgens and increase of VTG. The results suggest adverse effects of BPA on sperm motility and velocity via modifications of testicular steroidogenesis that might correspond to alternation in sperm maturation. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据