4.7 Article

Protective effect of Withania somnifera against radiation-induced hepatotoxicity in rats

期刊

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
卷 80, 期 -, 页码 14-19

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.02.003

关键词

Withania somnifera; Ionizing radiation; Hepatotoxicity; DNA; Heme oxygenase-1 and nitric oxide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to investigate the protective effect of root extract of Withania somnifera (WS) against gamma-irradiation-induced oxidative stress and DNA damage in hepatic tissue after whole body gamma-irradiation. Fourty male albino rats were divided into four groups. In the control group, rats were administered vehicle by tube for 7 consecutive days. The second group were administered WS (100 mg/kg, by gavage) for 7 consecutive days. Animals in the third group were administered vehicle by tube for 7 consecutive days, then exposed to single dose gamma-irradiation (6 Gy). The fourth group received WS for 7 consecutive days, one hour later rats were exposed to gamma-irradiation. Irradiation hepatotoxicity was manifested biochemically by an increase in hepatic serum enzymes, significant elevation in levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and total nitrate/nitrite NO(x), significant increase in heme oxygenase activity (HO-1), as well as a significant decrease in reduced glutathione (GSH) content and the activities of antioxidant enzymes, including superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GSHPx) in hepatic tissues. Marked DNA damage was observed. WS pretreatment showed significant decrease in serum hepatic enzymes, hepatic NO(x) and MDA levels and DNA damage, significant HO-1 induction and significant increase in SOD, GSHPx activities and GSH content compared to irradiated group. These observations suggest that WS could be developed as a potential preventive drug for ionizing irradiation induced hepatotoxicity disorders via enhancing the antioxidant activity and induction of HO-1. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据