4.7 Article

High sensitivity of Gammarus sp. juveniles to deltamethrin: Outcomes for risk assessment

期刊

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
卷 73, 期 6, 页码 1402-1407

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.02.011

关键词

Gammarus pulex; Gammarus fossarum; Sensitivity; Dose-response; Stage development; Pesticide; Pyrethroid; Amphipod

资金

  1. Conseil Regional de Franche-Comte (Region Council)
  2. Agence de l'Eau Rhone, Mediterrannee et Corse (French Water Administration)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amphipods from the genus Gammarus are among the most frequently used organisms in ecotoxicological testing and in situ bioindication. Because of their importance in risk assessment, it is necessary to understand the potential roles of life stage, population source and inter-specific differences on the sensitivity of these organisms to contaminants. In the present study, the acute toxicity of deltamethrin, a commonly used pyrethroid insecticide, has been tested for Gammarus fossarum and Gammarus pulex (Crustacea, Amphipoda) to document the inter- and intra-specific variability at different developmental stages. Adult G. fossarum were about two-fold more sensitive to deltamethrin than adult G. pulex, 96-h LC50 being 33.2 and 68.0 ng L-1, respectively. However, in the same species, significant differences of sensitivity were observed between individuals from different locations. Furthermore, G. fossarum from certain localities were less sensitive to deltamethrin than certain G. pulex. In addition, juveniles of both species were about 14- to 22-fold more sensitive to deltamethrin than adults: 48-h LC50 in G. fossarum and G. pulex juveniles were 4.0 and 5.7 ng L-1. Therefore, lethal effects of deltamethrin on Gammarus sp. populations likely depend more on juvenile response rather than on adult response. Since juveniles were also the most abundant population component, the present results show that risk assessment should consider at this developmental stage. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据