4.5 Article

Nanoparticle analysis and characterization methodologies in environmental risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles

期刊

ECOTOXICOLOGY
卷 17, 期 5, 页码 344-361

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10646-008-0225-x

关键词

nanoparticles; nanoaggregates; nanometrology; analytical chemistry; particle size analysis

资金

  1. NERC [pml010003, NE/E014321/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [pml010003, NE/E014321/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Environmental risk assessments of engineered nanoparticles require thorough characterization of nanoparticles and their aggregates. Furthermore, quantitative analytical methods are required to determine environmental concentrations and enable both effect and exposure assessments. Many methods still need optimization and development, especially for new types of nanoparticles in water, but extensive experience can be gained from the fields of environmental chemistry of natural nanomaterials and from fundamental colloid chemistry. This review briefly describes most methods that are being exploited in nanoecotoxicology for analysis and characterization of nanomaterials. Methodological aspects are discussed in relation to the fields of nanometrology, particle size analysis and analytical chemistry. Differences in both the type of size measures (length, radius, aspect ratio, etc.), and the type of average or distributions afforded by the specific measures are compared. The strengths of single particle methods, such as electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy, with respect to imaging, shape determinations and application to particle process studies are discussed, together with their limitations in terms of counting statistics and sample preparation. Methods based on the measurement of particle populations are discussed in terms of their quantitative analyses, but the necessity of knowing their limitations in size range and concentration range is also considered. The advantage of combining complementary methods is highlighted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据