4.0 Article

Behavioral reactions of brown bears to approaching humans in Fennoscandia

期刊

ECOSCIENCE
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 23-33

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/11956860.2018.1513387

关键词

Experimental human disturbance; flight initiation distance; flight responses; human density; road density

类别

资金

  1. Norwegian Environment Agency
  2. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
  3. Austrian Science Fund
  4. Swedish Association for Hunting and Wildlife Management
  5. Jenny and Antti Wihuri foundation
  6. Ella and Georg Ehrnrooth foundation
  7. Kone and Oskar Oflund foundation
  8. Norwegian Environment Agency [12040017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human disturbance causes behavioral responses in wildlife, including large carnivores. Previous research in Scandinavia has documented that brown bears (Ursus arctos) show a variety of behavioral reactions to different human activities. We investigated how proximity to human settlements and roads, as proxies of human influence, affected brown bears' reactions to encountering humans. We analyzed experimental approaches to GPS collared bears, 18 males and 23 single females, in Sweden (n = 148 approaches) and Finland (n = 33), conducted between 2004 and 2012. The bears in Finland inhabited areas with higher human density compared to Sweden. However, the proportion of bears staying or moving when approached and the flight initiation distances were similar in both countries. In Sweden, the flight responses were not dependent on human densities or roads inside the bears' home ranges or the distances from the bears to roads and settlements. Brown bears in Fennoscandia live in areas with relatively low human population densities, but in many areas with high forestry road densities. Our results show that bears' flight reactions were consistent between areas, which is an important message for management, reinforcing previous studies that have documented human avoidance by bears at different spatial and temporal scales.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据