4.0 Article

Dendroecological analysis of black spruce in lichen-spruce woodlands of the closed-crown forest zone in eastern Canada

期刊

ECOSCIENCE
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 279-294

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.2980/18-3-3438

关键词

black spruce; boreal forest; climate change; fire; lichen woodland; Picea mariana; tree growth; stand age

类别

资金

  1. Fonds quebecois de la recherche sur la nature et les technologies (FQRNT)
  2. Fonds forestier du Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean region
  3. Consortium de recherche sur la foret boreale commerciale
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lichen-spruce woodlands occur in the closed-crown forest zone as a divergent type of the spruce-moss forest because of regeneration failure caused by compounded disturbances (fire, insect outbreaks, and logging). From the southern limit of distribution of lichen woodlands (47 degrees 30' N) to the northern limit of the closed-crown forest zone (52 degrees 40' N), 53 lichen woodlands were sampled for a detailed dendroecological analysis. Radial, height, and volumetric growth of black spruce (Picea mariana) trees among the woodlands varied significantly according to stand age. Growth rates were similar for all even-aged spruce trees, whereas growth rates of trees < 100 y old were significantly greater than those of trees > 100 y old. No significant differences were found in growth rates of spruces distributed along the latitudinal gradient. Spruce trees were generally small in all the woodlands studied, with only a few trees taller than 12 m. Although spruce budworm may have affected all stands, the timing and intensity of the infestations were not necessarily synchronous among the studied stands. Partial least square response (PLS) functions were calculated to evaluate the impact of climate on tree-rings with latitude. Along the 600-km transect, PLS response functions indicated that growth was strongly influenced by current and previous year climatic conditions, particularly precipitation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据