4.2 Article

Nationalization and Globalization Trends in the Wild Mushroom Commerce of Italy with Emphasis on Porcini (Boletus edulis and Allied Species)

期刊

ECONOMIC BOTANY
卷 62, 期 3, 页码 307-322

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12231-008-9037-4

关键词

Porcini; Wild mushrooms; Fresh; Dried; Brine; Trade; Italy; Globalization; Nationalization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nationalization and Globalization Trends in the Wild Mushroom Commerce of Italy with Emphasis on Porcini (Boletus edulis and Allied Species). This paper presents an historical overview of wild mushroom commerce in Italy, with a focus on recent trends in the production of porcini (Boletus edulis and closely allied species). Over the past century, two major trends-nationalization and globalization-have been apparent in the wild mushroom commerce of Italy. First, a simplified national mushroom menu has emerged through processes of governmental regulation and culinary fashion, but it has come at the expense of differing, localized mushroom traditions which may suffer under the European Union's free trade principles. Second, Italy has emerged as a focal point of a global market for a small number of mushroom species-particular porcini. While the name porcini has become synonymous with Italian cuisine, and in spite of a vibrant tradition of recreational mushroom collecting in Italy, most of the porcini commercially available in Italy or exported by Italy are no longer of Italian origin. Porcini and other mushrooms now flow into Italy from all over the world-especially from China and eastern Europe-and are then often exported as Italian porcini. This globalization of the wild mushroom trade, while offering significant income to rural producers and processors around the globe, has other effects as well, for example, a kind of national branding as Italian of globally-produced products, of which porcini is one, that is in direct opposition to some of the European Union's rules for regional denominations

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据