4.8 Article

Habitat area and climate stability determine geographical variation in plant species range sizes

期刊

ECOLOGY LETTERS
卷 16, 期 12, 页码 1446-1454

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12184

关键词

Climate stability; geographical range size; habitat area; New World; plants; Rapoport's rule

类别

资金

  1. National Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis
  2. NSF [EF-0553768]
  3. University of California, Santa Barbara
  4. State of California
  5. iPlant (National Science Foundation) [DBI-0735191]
  6. EliteForsk Award
  7. Aarhus University Research Foundation
  8. Centre for Informatics Research on Complexity in Ecology (CIRCE)
  9. Aarhus University Research Foundation under the AU Ideas
  10. European Research Council (ERC) [310886]
  11. Danish Council for Independent Research - Natural Sciences [12-125079]
  12. European Community [221060]
  13. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [P505/11/2387]
  14. NSF
  15. European Research Council (ERC) [310886] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite being a fundamental aspect of biodiversity, little is known about what controls species range sizes. This is especially the case for hyperdiverse organisms such as plants. We use the largest botanical data set assembled to date to quantify geographical variation in range size for similar to 85000 plant species across the New World. We assess prominent hypothesised range-size controls, finding that plant range sizes are codetermined by habitat area and long- and short-term climate stability. Strong short- and long-term climate instability in large parts of North America, including past glaciations, are associated with broad-ranged species. In contrast, small habitat areas and a stable climate characterise areas with high concentrations of small-ranged species in the Andes, Central America and the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest region. The joint roles of area and climate stability strengthen concerns over the potential effects of future climate change and habitat loss on biodiversity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据