4.8 Article

A conceptual framework for the evolution of ecological specialisation

期刊

ECOLOGY LETTERS
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 841-851

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01645.x

关键词

Behaviour; coevolution; competition; constraints; environment; mutualism; niche; parasitism; predation; specialisation; species interactions

类别

资金

  1. EvolStress [ANR-09-BLAN-099-01]
  2. EvoRange [2009-PEXT-011-01]
  3. CoMute [ANR-06-BLAN-0164-01]
  4. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [5RO1 GM074265-01A2]
  5. CSIRO
  6. [NSF-DEB-0919434]
  7. [NSF-DEB-1050237]
  8. [NIH-5 R01 GM092660]
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences
  10. Division Of Environmental Biology [0919434] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Division Of Environmental Biology
  12. Direct For Biological Sciences [1050237] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  13. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-06-BLAN-0164] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ecological specialisation concerns all species and underlies many major ecological and evolutionary patterns. Yet its status as a unifying concept is not always appreciated because of its similarity to concepts of the niche, the many levels of biological phenomena to which it applies, and the complexity of the mechanisms influencing it. The evolution of specialisation requires the coupling of constraints on adaptive evolution with covariation of genotype and environmental performance. This covariation itself depends upon organismal properties such as dispersal behaviour and life history and complexity in the environment stemming from factors such as species interactions and spatio-temporal heterogeneity in resources. Here, we develop a view on specialisation that integrates across the range of biological phenomena with the goal of developing a more predictive conceptual framework that specifically accounts for the importance of biotic complexity and coevolutionary events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据