4.8 Article

Land-use intensification reduces functional redundancy and response diversity in plant communities

期刊

ECOLOGY LETTERS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 76-86

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01403.x

关键词

Functional diversity; land-use change; redundancy; resilience; response diversity

类别

资金

  1. ARC-NZ Research Network for Vegetation Function [WG-31]
  2. University of Canterbury
  3. FQRNT
  4. Education New Zealand
  5. Universite de Montreal
  6. Miss E.L. Hellaby Indigenous Grassland Research Trust
  7. NSERC
  8. Norwegian Research Council
  9. CATIE
  10. Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility (Australia), Stanford University
  11. Theresa Heinz Foundation
  12. Winslow Foundation
  13. Peter and Helen Bing
  14. Australian Government's MTSRF
  15. Foundation for Science and Technology (Portugal)
  16. CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems
  17. NSF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ecosystem resilience depends on functional redundancy (the number of species contributing similarly to an ecosystem function) and response diversity (how functionally similar species respond differently to disturbance). Here, we explore how land-use change impacts these attributes in plant communities, using data from 18 land-use intensity gradients that represent five biomes and > 2800 species. We identify functional groups using multivariate analysis of plant traits which influence ecosystem processes. Functional redundancy is calculated as the species richness within each group, and response diversity as the multivariate within-group dispersion in response trait space, using traits that influence responses to disturbances. Meta-analysis across all datasets showed that land-use intensification significantly reduced both functional redundancy and response diversity, although specific relationships varied considerably among the different land-use gradients. These results indicate that intensified management of ecosystems for resource extraction can increase their vulnerability to future disturbances. Ecology Letters (2010) 13: 76-86.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据