4.8 Review

Meta-analysis reveals negative yet variable effects of ocean acidification on marine organisms

期刊

ECOLOGY LETTERS
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 1419-1434

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01518.x

关键词

Calcification; carbonate chemistry; climate change; CO2; growth; meta-analysis; ocean acidification; ontogeny; pH; photosynthesis; reproduction

类别

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. The Nature Conservancy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>Ocean acidification is a pervasive stressor that could affect many marine organisms and cause profound ecological shifts. A variety of biological responses to ocean acidification have been measured across a range of taxa, but this information exists as case studies and has not been synthesized into meaningful comparisons amongst response variables and functional groups. We used meta-analytic techniques to explore the biological responses to ocean acidification, and found negative effects on survival, calcification, growth and reproduction. However, there was significant variation in the sensitivity of marine organisms. Calcifying organisms generally exhibited larger negative responses than non-calcifying organisms across numerous response variables, with the exception of crustaceans, which calcify but were not negatively affected. Calcification responses varied significantly amongst organisms using different mineral forms of calcium carbonate. Organisms using one of the more soluble forms of calcium carbonate (high-magnesium calcite) can be more resilient to ocean acidification than less soluble forms (calcite and aragonite). Additionally, there was variation in the sensitivities of different developmental stages, but this variation was dependent on the taxonomic group. Our analyses suggest that the biological effects of ocean acidification are generally large and negative, but the variation in sensitivity amongst organisms has important implications for ecosystem responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据