4.7 Article

Sunscreening fungal pigments influence the vertical gradient of pendulous lichens in boreal forest canopies

期刊

ECOLOGY
卷 95, 期 6, 页码 1464-1471

出版社

ECOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1890/13-2319.1

关键词

Alectoria sarmentosa; boreal forest; Bryoria spp.; desiccation tolerance; epiphytes; melanin; photoinhibition; sunscreening pigments; Totenasen, Norway; Usnea spp.; usnic acid; Vindeln, Sweden

类别

资金

  1. PROMOS scholarship from Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
  2. Formas (Sweden) [230-2011-1559]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pendulous lichens dominate canopies of boreal forests, with dark Bryoria species in the upper canopy vs. light Alectoria and Usnea species in lower canopy. These genera offer important ecosystem services such as winter forage for reindeer and caribou. The mechanism behind this niche separation is poorly understood. We tested the hypothesis that species-specific sunscreening fungal pigments protect underlying symbiotic algae differently against high light, and thus shape the vertical canopy gradient of epiphytes. Three pale species with the reflecting pigment usnic acid (Alectoria sarmentosa, Usnea dasypoga, U. longissima) and three with dark, absorbing melanins (Bryoria capillaris, B. fremontii, B. fuscescens) were compared. We subjected the lichens to desiccation stress with and without light, and assessed their performance with chlorophyll fluorescence. Desiccation alone only affected U. longissima. By contrast, light in combination with desiccation caused photoinhibitory damage in all species. Usnic lichens were significantly more susceptible to light during desiccation than melanic ones. Thus, melanin is a more efficient light-screening pigment than usnic acid. Thereby, the vertical gradient of pendulous lichens in forest canopies is consistent with a shift in type and functioning of sunscreening pigments, from high-light-tolerant Bryoria in the upper to susceptible Alectoria and Usnea in the lower canopy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据