4.7 Article

Leaf herbivory increases plant fitness via induced resistance to seed predators

期刊

ECOLOGY
卷 94, 期 4, 页码 966-975

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/12-1664.1

关键词

ellagitannins; induced defense; jasmonic acid; oenothein A; oenothein B; Oenothera biennis; phenolics; Popillia japonica; tannins

类别

资金

  1. USDA-NRI [2006-35302-1731]
  2. Academy of Finland [119659]
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [119659, 119659] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Early-season herbivory can cause plants to induce resistance to subsequent herbivores, and this ubiquitous plant defense strategy has been shown to be adaptive when subsequent vegetative-feeding herbivores impact plant fitness. However, a growing number of studies show that leaf herbivory can also induce defenses in plant reproductive tissues, which may deter mutualists such as pollinators and seed dispersers, or antagonists such as florivores and seed predators. Due to their direct interaction with plant reproductive tissues, deterrence of these mutualists or antagonists may have large negative or positive effects on plant fitness. Despite numerous predictions, we know little regarding the fitness consequences of leaf-to-reproductive tissue induction in nature. Here, using observations of natural populations and manipulative field experiments, we show that leaf herbivory by the invasive Japanese beetle (Popillia japonica) induces an accumulation of jasmonic acid and complex phenolics in reproductive tissues of the common evening primrose (Oenothera biennis). Consequently, seed predation by three native Lepidoptera is reduced by 77% on beetle-induced plants, while leaf herbivory itself has little impact on lifetime reproductive output. These results show that O. biennis benefits from being consumed by an invasive folivore, and that leaf-to-reproductive tissue induction can be an adaptive trait. Induced plant defenses can therefore be beneficial in a broader community context than previously realized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据