4.7 Article

Responses of soil microbial communities to water stress: results from a meta-analysis

期刊

ECOLOGY
卷 93, 期 4, 页码 930-938

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/11-0026.1

关键词

bacteria; fungi; heterotrophic respiration-soil moisture relations; soil respiration; solute diffusion; water potential; water stress

类别

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) through the Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER) (NICCR) [DE-FC02-06ER64156]
  2. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) [2011-67003-30222]
  3. National Science Foundation [CBET-1033467, DEB-0640666]
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1033467] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil heterotrophic respiration and nutrient mineralization are strongly affected by environmental conditions, in particular by moisture fluctuations triggered by rainfall events. When soil moisture decreases, so does decomposers' activity, with microfauna generally undergoing stress sooner than bacteria and fungi. Despite differences in the responses of individual decomposer groups to moisture availability (e.g., bacteria are typically more sensitive than fungi to water stress), we show that responses of decomposers at the community level are different in soils and surface litter, but similar across biomes and climates. This results in a nearly constant soil-moisture threshold corresponding to the point when biological activity ceases, at a water potential of about -14 MPa in mineral soils and -36 MPa in surface litter. This threshold is shown to be comparable to the soil moisture value where solute diffusion becomes strongly inhibited in soil, while in litter it is dehydration rather than diffusion that likely limits biological activity around the stress point. Because of these intrinsic constraints and lack of adaptation to different hydro-climatic regimes, changes in rainfall patterns (primary drivers of the soil moisture balance) may have dramatic impacts on soil carbon and nutrient cycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据