4.7 Article

Experimental evidence that phenotypic divergence in predators drives community divergence in prey

期刊

ECOLOGY
卷 90, 期 2, 页码 300-305

出版社

ECOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1890/08-1673.1

关键词

adaptive divergence; alewife; Alosa pseudoharengus; eco-evolutionary interactions; extended phenotype; gill rakers; intraspecific variation; niche construction; phenotypic divergence; predator-prey interactions; size-selective predation; zooplankton

类别

资金

  1. EPA STAR Fellowship
  2. Quebec-Labrador Foundation
  3. Connecticut Institute for Water Resources
  4. National Science Foundation [0717265]
  5. Yale University IACUC [2003-10734]
  6. Connecticut DEP (Scientific Collector Permit) [SC-04016]
  7. Division Of Environmental Biology
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences [0717265] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies of adaptive divergence have traditionally focused on the ecological causes of trait diversification, while the ecological consequences of phenotypic divergence remain relatively unexplored. Divergence in predator foraging traits, in particular, has the potential to impact the structure and dynamics of ecological communities. To examine the effects of predator trait divergence on prey communities, we exposed zooplankton communities in lake mesocosms to predation from either anadromous or landlocked (freshwater resident) alewives, which have undergone recent and rapid phenotypic differentiation in foraging traits (gape width, gill raker spacing, and prey size-selectivity). Anadromous alewives, which exploit large prey items, significantly reduced the mean body size, total biomass, species richness, and diversity of crustacean zooplankton relative to landlocked alewives, which exploit smaller prey. The zooplankton responses observed in this experiment are consistent with patterns observed in lakes. This study provides direct evidence that phenotypic divergence in predators, even in its early stages, can play a critical role in determining prey community structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据