4.7 Article

Wolves modulate soil nutrient heterogeneity and foliar nitrogen by configuring the distribution of ungulate carcasses

期刊

ECOLOGY
卷 90, 期 11, 页码 3159-3167

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1890/09-0292.1

关键词

animal-ecosystem links; carcass; carnivore; ecosystem function; heterogeneity; indirect effect; Isle Royale; moose; predator-prey; resource patch; spatial pattern; wolves

类别

资金

  1. NSF [9972803, DEB-0424562]
  2. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [F5F71445]
  3. EPA [F5F71445, 910444] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  4. Direct For Education and Human Resources
  5. Division Of Graduate Education [9972803] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [0918247] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mechanistic links between top terrestrial predators and biogeochemical processes remain poorly understood. Here we demonstrate that large carnivores configure landscape heterogeneity through prey carcass distribution. A 50-year record composed of >3600 moose carcasses from Isle Royale National Park, Michigan, USA, showed that wolves modulate heterogeneity in soil nutrients, soil microbes, and plant quality by clustering prey carcasses over space. Despite being well utilized by predators, moose carcasses resulted in elevated soil macronutrients and microbial biomass, shifts in soil microbial composition, and elevated leaf nitrogen for at least 2-3 years at kill sites. Wolf-killed moose were deposited in some regions of the study landscape at up to 12x the rate of deposition in other regions. Carcass density also varied temporally, changing as much as 19-fold in some locations during the 50-year study period. This variation arises, in part, directly from variation in wolf hunting behavior. This study identifies a top terrestrial predator as a mechanism generating landscape heterogeneity, demonstrating reciprocal links between large carnivore behavior and ecosystem function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据