4.7 Article

Woodland-to-forest transition during prolonged drought in Minnesota after ca. AD 1300

期刊

ECOLOGY
卷 90, 期 10, 页码 2792-2807

出版社

ECOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1890/08-0985.1

关键词

Big Woods, Minnesota, USA; drought; ecological surprises; fire; forest expansion; fossil pollen analysis; lake levels; prairie-forest ecotone; radiocarbon dating; woodlands

类别

资金

  1. University of Minnesota Graduate School
  2. University of Minnesota McKnight Land-Grant Professorship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interactions among multiple causes of ecological perturbation, such as climate change and disturbance, can produce ecological surprises. Here, we examine whether climate-fire-vegetation interactions can produce ecological changes that differ in direction from those expected from the effects of climate change alone. To do so, we focus on the Big Woods of central Minnesota, USA, which was shaped both by climate and. re. The deciduous Big Woods forest replaced regional woodlands and savannas after the severity of regional. re regimes declined at ca. AD 1300. A trend toward wet conditions has long been assumed to explain the forest expansion, but we show that water levels at two lakes within the region (Wolsfeld Lake and Bufflehead Pond) were low when open woodlands were transformed into the Big Woods. Water levels were high instead at ca. 2240-795 BC when regional. re regimes were most severe. Based on the correlation between water levels and fire-regime severity, we infer that prolonged or repeated droughts after ca. AD 1265 reduced the biomass and connectivity of. ne fuels (grasses) within the woodlands. As a result, regional. re severity declined and allowed tree populations to expand. Tree-ring data from the region show a peak in the recruitment of key Big Woods tree species during the AD 1930s drought and suggest that low regional moisture balance need not have been a limiting factor for forest expansion. The regional history, thus, demonstrates the types of counterintuitive ecosystem changes that may arise as climate changes in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据