4.5 Article

Do indirect interactions always contribute to net indirect facilitation?

期刊

ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
卷 268, 期 -, 页码 1-8

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.07.029

关键词

Competition; Emergent properties; Indirect positive interaction; Individual-based model; Spatially explicit model

类别

资金

  1. University of Bordeaux
  2. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China [31230014]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31270472, 31070357, 40901019, 31000203, 31000178]
  4. Central University special fund for basic research and operating expenses of China [lzujbky-2013-101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Indirect facilitation theory assumes that the addition of species in complex communities should decrease competitive interactions through the emergence of positive indirect effects among competitors. However, experiments conducted in communities have rarely observed a net indirect facilitation. We hypothesize that this may be due to the likely occurrence of negative indirect interactions that were overlooked in indirect facilitation theory. We used a spatially explicit modeling approach to quantify indirect effects and net interactions occurring within a system of three competitors. In contrast to field experiments our modeling approach allows quantifying positive indirect effects since their calculation needs to be done in absence of direct negative effects. We showed the existence in a system of three competitors of two negative indirect interactions, in addition to the positive one emphasized in indirect facilitation theory. We also made precise the conditions under which the balance of these three indirect interactions becomes negative and induces a competition enhancement and in turn no net indirect facilitation. The existence of negative indirect effects among competitors contributes to explain the rare occurrence of indirect facilitation in plant communities. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据