4.5 Article

A three-component model of phytoplankton size class for the Atlantic Ocean

期刊

ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
卷 221, 期 11, 页码 1472-1483

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.02.014

关键词

Phytoplankton; Pigment; Size; Ocean colour; Remote sensing; Chlorophyll-a; SeaWiFS

类别

资金

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  2. National Environmental Research Council, UK
  3. National Centre for Earth Observation
  4. NERC Oceans 2025 programme
  5. NERC [pml010007, earth010003] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [earth010003, pml010007] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A three-component model was developed which calculates the fractional contributions of three phytoplankton size classes (micro-, nano- and picoplankton) to the overall chlorophyll-a concentration in the Atlantic Ocean. The model is an extension of the Sathyendranath et al. (2001) approach, based on the assumption that small cells dominate at low chlorophyll-a concentrations and large cells at high chlorophyll-a concentrations. Diagnostic pigments were used to infer cell size using an established technique adapted to account for small picoeukaroytes in ultra-oligotrophic environments. Atlantic Meridional Transect (AMT) pigment data taken between 1997 and 2004 were split into two datasets; 1935 measurements were used to parameterise the model, and a further 241 surface measurements, spatially and temporally matched to chlorophyll-a derived from SeaWiFS satellite data, were set aside to validate the model. Comparison with an independent global pigment dataset (256 measurements) also supports the broader-scale application of the model. The effect of optical depth on the model parameters was also investigated and explicitly incorporated into the model. It is envisaged that future applications would include validating multi-plankton biogeochemical models and improving primary-production estimates by accounting for community composition. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据