4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Modeling radial growth increment of black alder (Alnus glutionsa (L.) Gaertn.) tree

期刊

ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
卷 215, 期 1-3, 页码 180-189

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.02.018

关键词

wetland forest; black alder; forest growth model; feature selection; machine learning; STELLA model

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nowadays it is extremely important to understand ecosystem function and its dynamics to predict future changes and consequently to perform appropriate measures. Hydromeliorations and subsequent decrease in groundwater table are thought to be a major reason for a decline in the vitality of black alder (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.) wetland forests in Northeastern Slovenia. In this study radial increments of trees were used as indicators of black alder forest function and its disturbances. The aim of the study was to build a model of annual radial increments of black alder trees, to use this model to identify environmental attributes that most importantly affect ecosystem's function and to predict changes in the forest function under different scenarios of environmental conditions in the future. The model was induced with a machine learning algorithm CIPER and it was based on the data about site conditions and applied management measures in the past 35 years. Groundwater levels in combination with the duration of sun radiation were identified as the most important environmental attributes affecting annual radial increments. Radial increments were the lowest in very wet and cloudy years. On the other hand, radial increments were decreased under drought stress as well. Changes in groundwater level and in duration of sun radiation, as well as increased oscillations of groundwater level, all cause important increase in oscillations of modeled radial increments, indicating higher stress. Radial increments were further negatively affected by late white frosts in the spring. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据