4.7 Article

Relationships between land use patterns and water quality in the Taizi River basin, China

期刊

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 187-197

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.003

关键词

Land use; Landscape metrics; Water quality; Correlation coefficient; Multiple linear regression; Factor analysis

资金

  1. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment in China [2008ZX07526-001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41103069]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using land use types and landscape metrics, as well as statistical and spatial analysis, we determined the relationships between land use patterns and river water quality in the Taizi River basin, China, during dry and rainy seasons in 2009. Correlation and multiple linear regressions indicated that vegetated areas had a positive contribution to river water quality and predicted total nitrogen during the rainy season. Built-up land use strongly influenced nitrogen and phosphorus parameters in river water. Agricultural land use was associated with most physicochemical variables and nitrogen during the rainy season. Landscape metrics during both seasons were significantly associated with river water quality. Shannon's diversity index was the primary predictor for chloride and ammoniacal nitrogen. Mean Euclidean nearest neighbor index defined ammoniacal nitrogen, orthophosphate, and total phosphorus during the dry season. Biological oxygen demand and permanganate index were expressed by Contagion during the rainy season. Factor analysis indicated that the river suffered organic, phosphorus, and nitrogen pollution and a zone dominated by agricultural and built-up land uses in the river basin tended to have worse water quality than other areas. The results provide a useful approach that uses landscape patterns to estimate water quality in rivers for water pollution control and land use management. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据