4.7 Article

Caffeine as an anthropogenic marker of domestic waste: A study from Lake Simcoe watershed

期刊

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
卷 23, 期 -, 页码 501-508

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.001

关键词

Caffeine; Total coliforms; Fecal coliforms; Inland waters; Water quality; Anthropogenic marker

资金

  1. Environment Canada, Lake Simcoe Clean-Up Fund
  2. North Mara Beach Residents Association
  3. KFTE, Orillia
  4. Lake Simcoe Regional Conservation Association, Ministry of the Environment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reliability of using caffeine (1,3,7-trimethyl xanthine) as an anthropogenic marker of human mediated contaminants in the inland water system has been studied from the Lake Simcoe watershed in Central Ontario, Canada. Both water and sediment samples were collected on a biweekly interval from five sampling locations for a period of 8 months from May to December 2010. In addition, bacterial indicators of the water quality was monitored by enumerating the total coliform and fecal coliform (Escherichia coli) in the water and sediment samples from these sampling locations. The results showed the occurrence of caffeine in all samples collected throughout the study period indicating the presence of human domestic waste in these locations. The coliforms and caffeine in water were negatively correlated while a positive correlation was obtained between these parameters in sediment samples. The study showed a statistically significant variation in caffeine between the sampling locations over the study period with the maximum value recorded at Site 2, the most anthropogenically disturbed area. The seasonal variation of caffeine concentration showed higher values in summer months compared to others and this corresponded to the increased human activities in this area during this period. To conclude, monitoring of caffeine coupled with the bacterial indicators could help to track the origin of contaminants in the inland water systems. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据